<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Decoupling Demystified</title>
	<atom:link href="http://steadystaterevolution.org/decoupling-demystified/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://steadystaterevolution.org/decoupling-demystified/</link>
	<description>Fighting for a Sustainable World with a Steady State Economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 16:16:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick Palmer</title>
		<link>http://steadystaterevolution.org/decoupling-demystified/comment-page-1/#comment-1406</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Palmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 16:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steadystaterevolution.org/?p=2532#comment-1406</guid>
		<description>Jauho. I think it is aklways helpful to discriminate between the terms growth and development when talking about economics. It is not just a trivial semantic distinction.

Growth can be described as those aspects of the economy that consume more and more energy, use more and more material resources, space etc and create more and more waste. Development is those aspects that achieve more and more &quot;production&quot; of  things of value to humanity whilst using the same or less energy, materials, space etc and creating less and less waste.

While we lived in an &quot;empty&quot; world of up to a couple of billion souls growth served us well but we are now charging towards the limits that, unless we want to avoid a horrendous Jared Diamond like crash, show us that it is imperative to stop the growth economy in its tracks and substitute the steady state economy. Developing that will give inceasing real human wealth without threatening out futures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jauho. I think it is aklways helpful to discriminate between the terms growth and development when talking about economics. It is not just a trivial semantic distinction.</p>
<p>Growth can be described as those aspects of the economy that consume more and more energy, use more and more material resources, space etc and create more and more waste. Development is those aspects that achieve more and more &#8220;production&#8221; of  things of value to humanity whilst using the same or less energy, materials, space etc and creating less and less waste.</p>
<p>While we lived in an &#8220;empty&#8221; world of up to a couple of billion souls growth served us well but we are now charging towards the limits that, unless we want to avoid a horrendous Jared Diamond like crash, show us that it is imperative to stop the growth economy in its tracks and substitute the steady state economy. Developing that will give inceasing real human wealth without threatening out futures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Jackson: Prosperity Without Growth - Post Growth</title>
		<link>http://steadystaterevolution.org/decoupling-demystified/comment-page-1/#comment-1154</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Jackson: Prosperity Without Growth - Post Growth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 16:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steadystaterevolution.org/?p=2532#comment-1154</guid>
		<description>[...] Jackson is a rock-star. At least in the post growth community, in my opinion. He has helped to further an intelligent, deliberate conversation about what we need as people on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jackson is a rock-star. At least in the post growth community, in my opinion. He has helped to further an intelligent, deliberate conversation about what we need as people on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No-Growth Economics and You</title>
		<link>http://steadystaterevolution.org/decoupling-demystified/comment-page-1/#comment-1033</link>
		<dc:creator>No-Growth Economics and You</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steadystaterevolution.org/?p=2532#comment-1033</guid>
		<description>[...] The last one is without a doubt, absolutely impossible in a growing economy &#8211; for the very same reason why we cannot improve our technology fast enough to make up for growth (also known as decoupling, which is a myth). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The last one is without a doubt, absolutely impossible in a growing economy &#8211; for the very same reason why we cannot improve our technology fast enough to make up for growth (also known as decoupling, which is a myth). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social business and the limits to growth &#124; whydev.org</title>
		<link>http://steadystaterevolution.org/decoupling-demystified/comment-page-1/#comment-1010</link>
		<dc:creator>Social business and the limits to growth &#124; whydev.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 01:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steadystaterevolution.org/?p=2532#comment-1010</guid>
		<description>[...] In this sense, there is mounting evidence that such faith is misplaced; that the idea of de-coupling economic growth from environmental degradation at the speed required to avoid catastrophic effects [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In this sense, there is mounting evidence that such faith is misplaced; that the idea of de-coupling economic growth from environmental degradation at the speed required to avoid catastrophic effects [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nothing Grows Forever</title>
		<link>http://steadystaterevolution.org/decoupling-demystified/comment-page-1/#comment-849</link>
		<dc:creator>Nothing Grows Forever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 14:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steadystaterevolution.org/?p=2532#comment-849</guid>
		<description>[...] the past Daly has the idea of decoupling the economy from resource consumption a chimera. Daly&#8217;s view on this topic drives home the point that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the past Daly has the idea of decoupling the economy from resource consumption a chimera. Daly&#8217;s view on this topic drives home the point that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Limits of Efficiency</title>
		<link>http://steadystaterevolution.org/decoupling-demystified/comment-page-1/#comment-818</link>
		<dc:creator>The Limits of Efficiency</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steadystaterevolution.org/?p=2532#comment-818</guid>
		<description>[...] few months ago I wrote about the myth of decoupling &#8211; how you cannot separate economic growth from environmental impact. I touched on a topic in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] few months ago I wrote about the myth of decoupling &#8211; how you cannot separate economic growth from environmental impact. I touched on a topic in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

